2002_10_11 The Ace Backwords Report 4

Random Archives Banner

I’m a philosophical sort. It’s not that I’ve read much of the great philosophers and intellectual egg-heads of our day. It’s more that I have this constant compulsion in my head: this basic thought that keeps repeating itself every day, all throughout the day: “WHAT THE FUKK IS THIS ALL ABOUT?” What IS this life, anyway? Who ARE we? What are people FOR? And what exactly IS this strange world in front of us; this enchanting and ever-shifting mixture of light and sound and feeling? This solid dream. This infinite Universe that little ol’ you and me are plopped smack dab right in the middle of. When you think about it: it is eminently weird that anything is even happening in the first place. It is all very mysterious, isn’t it?

Now this one so-called pragmatic friend of mine scoffs at all this philosophical thrashing. “Ace! You’re never going to figure it out, so what’s the point of thinking about it; what’s the point of smashing your head against that brick wall?”

Which is fine, except that one of my abiding philosophical hunches is that the whole POINT of this existence, the whole reason we’re here in the first place, is specifically to try and figure out the whole puzzle of it all.

Many people scoff at the notion of “philosophizing.” And there are certainly many bad philosophers. But the fact is: everyone has a philosophy of life, whether they’ve given it much thought or not. All you have to do is spring one little question on them — “What do you think happens when you die?” — and all their most basic philosophical premises will come tumbling out.

Some friends of mine take sort of a pride in being “hard-boiled realists.” They consider themselves from the Sgt. Friday-nothing-but-the-facts school of philosophy. They maintain:

“Nothing happens when you die. They dig a hole and put you in the ground. You’re dead. that’s it. It’s all over. There’s no more to it than that.”

I mean, who knows for sure? None of us will truly find out until we die, right? And yet, as logical as they think this position is, it’s always struck me as the most illogical and absurd philosophical premise of all (as well as the most unimaginative). I mean, we’re in the midst of this awesome, mind-boggling, infinitely complex Infinite Universe. To think that one’s life — which is certainly part of this universe — would add up to nothing more than a meaningless speck of dirt in the face of Eternity hardly seems to jibe with the overall blueprint of the Universe.

What exactly IS this world in front of us? That’s the question that always keeps pushing its way into the front of my lobes. Philosophically speaking, the only thing I know for sure is that this whole Universe is One thing. Everything else I consider to be strictly in the realm of personal opinion. This entire universe is One Unified Thing. What this One Thing is, is almost completely beyond the realm of my understanding. But I’d certainly like to get more acquainted with The Guy, whoever or whatever He/It is.

He’s a very mysterious fellow for sure. Heh heh. I guess I’ll have to think about it some more……..

Backwords on Consensus Reality

Random Archives Banner

(originally published November 9, 2002)

 

Image may contain: 1 person

Lets talk about “consensus reality.”

Have you ever stood at a street corner with a crowd of pedestrians waiting for the light to turn green? If one guy jumps ahead, usually the rest of the crowd will follow, even if the lights still red and they end up in the middle of the intersection dodging cars whizzing by. Why? Because most people aren’t looking at the traffic lights themselves; they’re looking at the crowd, and following the herd. It’s basic human nature. It’s consensus reality.

For 12 years I’ve been telling people something startling that flies in the face of consensus reality: “HIV has nothing to do with AIDS.”

And for 12 years the crowd has been telling me I’m wrong, that I’m an idiot, and a fool, and a dangerous lunatic (and worse). All the while I’m enjoying that secret delicious kick that comes with the knowledge that one day I’ll be able to say: “I told you so.”

The “HIV equals AIDS” theory (and thats all it is: a theory that hasn’t yet been proved, a theory that never WILL be proved) is a classic example of how consensus reality works. (Or doesn’t work.) In this case, a guy named Dr. Robert Gallo is the genius who jumped ahead of the traffic light, and the crowd followed him. Gallo’s first claim to fame was as the guy who discovered HIV. Later it turned out he stole this from a scientist in France who discovered HIV 6 months earlier. And its typical of the way virtually everything that’s come out of Gallo’s mouth has been subsequently discredited, even as his “HIV equals AIDS” theory lived on, and became embedded in the minds of the crowd. Virtually every prediction this guy made has turned out wrong. AIDS didn’t spread into the heterosexual population as predicted. AIDS hasn’t acted like any other sexually-transmitted disease has acted (because it isn’t). Millions of people weren’t wiped out by this “plague.” AZT wasn’t a “cure,” it was in fact a toxic form of poison. And the same people who were dying from AIDS in the beginning — hardcore drug abusers and people indulging in shockingly unhealthy sexual practises — are the same people who are still dying from AIDS (and its no mystery to anyone with half a brain WHY they’re still dying).

Meanwhile, Gallo has become a millionaire many times over from the $billions in funding being pumped into AIDS research, as well as the patent he got for his HIV-detection kit. This guy Gallo made a fortune off of this scam, as did plenty of other so-called scientists, AIDS social workers, and pharmaceutical companies. Which is the main reason why the “HIV equals AIDS” scam managed to keep perpetuating itself, in spite of massive evidence to the contrary, because none of these frauds wanted to derail the gravy train.

Professor Peter Duesberg of Berkeley, on the other hand, is the hero of this sordid tale. He was the first guy to point out that the Emperor was in fact naked. And for his trouble — for daring to be the heretic who defied consensus reality — he was practically bankrupted; losing all his funding, being denied access to get his scientific papers published, and generally being treated as a pariah by his peers at UC Berkeley where he’s only nominally still employed these days.

But in the long run it doesn’t matter. For the truth always comes out in the long run. Bullzhit can be artificially sustained for astonishingly long periods of times; but the truth is like an airplane circling in the sky above the airport waiting to land. Eventually the truth has to come down.

Someone like Dr. Gallo seriously misunderstands (not just basic scientific ethics but) the basic laws of karma. You simply can’t bullzhit your way through life. You might be riding high at the moment, but you can’t outflank karma. All I can say is: Gallo better enjoy his kudos while he’s getting them, because he certainly will go down as one of the most despised scientists of our times. Just as Duesberg will go down as the great hero. Thats just how it works. Consensus reality is really nothing more than the fashions and styles of the moment, and with just as much shelf-life as these passing fads.

There’s another guy in Berkeley who refuses to go along with consensus reality. His name is Stephen Lightfoot and he’s convinced that Mark Chapman isn’t the guy who assassinated John Lennon. He’s convinced that horror-novelist Stephen King did it, in cahoots with Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. He’s got a whole conspiracy theory worked out in his head. And he has “proof.” He has “evidence.” Which is basically all these obscure references that he’s pulled out of TIME magazine and a book written by Richard Nixon. Which he claims is a “code” that when put together reveals the true murderer: Stephen King.

Even though everyone tells him he’s wrong, everyone tells him he’s an idiot or a lunatic (or worse)– even though his own family has disowned him for his nitwit theory — he persists. In the face of “massive evidence to the contrary” as they say. He’s spent tens of thousands of dollars printing up Xeroxed copies of his “evidence” which he hands out to perplexed passersby on street corners. And he’s spent years lobbying the media for “15 minutes of airtime to alert America to the truth!!” For years he’s been parking his van (which he also lives in) in front of TV and radio stations, with different messages emblazoned on the side in big letters: “THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT THE LENNON MURDER COVER-UP!! KING, REAGAN, NIXON THE REAL CULPRITS!!”

Often, in between handing out his literature, Lightfoot will serenade passersby with his guitar, playing flat, plaintive versions of different Beatles songs. He is the ultimate “nutter fan” that Lennon lived in terror of, who were drawn to him like flies to zhit, and who eventually killed him.

“BERKELEY, YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF!” Lightfoot would harangue the passersby. “I NEED YOUR HELP TO SEE THAT LENNON’S REAL KILLER IS BROUGHT TO JUSTICE! BUT YOU TURN YOUR BACK ON THE TRUTH! FOR SHAME, YOU MORAL COWARDS AND DEGENERATES!” Lightfoot has all the zeal of a fire-and-brimstone crusader. He is the Old Testament prophet returned, ignored and rebuked, and now Babylon must pay. He is Don Quixote and Stephen King is his windmill.

Every now and then I’ll feel the urge to ask him: “um…Has it ever occurred to you, Steve ol’ bean, that you might be…..wrong?”

But what would be the point of that. So many people simply don’t have the “might-be-wrong” gene in their genetic make-up. Personally, the “gee-I-might-be-wrong” impulse is the only thing that’s saved me over the years. For I can be as lunk-headed in my Know-it-all presumptions as anyone else. We all have our blind spots, and it’s quite probable you see mine more clearly than I see them myself.

2002_11_07 Backwords on Success, Failure, Attitude

Random Archives Banner
I’ve had this sense of failure that has dogged me all of my days. There was a line from an obscure Pete Townsend/Ronnie Layne song from 1978 that has always haunted me:

“His whole life was just another try.”

For that’s what it’s seemed to me. No matter what I’ve done, no matter what I’ve accomplished, theres always been this half-assed feeling like it hasn’t really added up to anything.

One of Johnny Carson’s ex-wives had a line about him, about the barren spiritual/emotional world he lived in, in spite of his great so-called success: “Its absurd to have accomplished so much and yet to have ended up with so little.” Johnny Carson himself used to have a recurring nightmare: “I’d be driving my car down this endless freeway in the desert, all alone, just me and the white line rushing under my car, but I never reach any destination. I just drive and drive to nowhere…”

And sometimes life certainly seems like that.

The other saying that haunts me is: “It’s all in how you look at it.” Which is certainly true. And yet, who amongst us really knows where that little switch is in our brain that controls the pictures we see, or the way our minds react to them? Certainly, if theres anything one can do to have a good, successful life, it involves learning how to control one’s mind: the runaway mind; the monkey mind; that jumps from here to there, seemingly out of control, jerking us every which way.

For example, I recently had a book published: “SURVIVING ON THE STREETS: How To Go Down Without Going Out.” (available from http://www.loompanics.com, or amazon.com). So I could look at that as a great success. Ace Backwords: Published Author. Radio stations and newspapers call me up to interview me so that I can spread my ever-so-important words to countless thousands.

And yet, on the other head, the book ironically chronicles the failure that my life has turned into. Ace Backwords: Homeless Bum; sleeping in the dirt and eating out of garbage cans.

So it’s all in how you look at it. And I’ve looked at it from both points of view — success and failure — and every other point of view in between. Is either point of view equally true? For the disquieting flip side to “It’s-all-in-how-you-look-at-it” is that it implies that there is no ultimate reality, at least from the level of the human mind. While theres certainly SOME indisputable truths — I’m 6 foot tall, 46 years old, not 3-foot-6, 12-years-old — when it comes to our ATTITUDE about life (which certainly shapes our very reality in a profoundly fundamental way) it seems that “reality” is totally a creation of the whims of our minds, and our emotions, and our delusions, and our opinions, and our chemical make-up, and (perhaps) our destined karma.

For example, sometimes I think I’m quite popular, that I have a lot of good friends and that I have a decent life. Other times I think I’m really all alone and I’m close to nobody and that I’m a total failure at relating to people. Which outlook is true? Both? Or neither?

Sometimes I think: “Well, if it’s just a matter of how you look at it, then I’m going to look at myself as a total Genius. If it’s all just a matter of opinion, and theres no concrete, definable “reality”, than I might as well err on the side of thinking TOO highly of myself, since I can’t really tell what I am one way or another anyways!”

I had this one friend, he took the pen-name “Hank Deadwood” — which should have told me something about how he saw himself. For we all reveal ourselves in a thousand different ways. Hank Deadwood was about my age, from an affluent suburban New Jersey background. He was good-looking, athletic, talented, an excellent musician, he could play guitar and saxophone, and he self-published a sort of Kerouac-esque novel about his adventures as a jazz-blowing, drug-taking street cat in San Francisco. We put his photo on the cover of our TELEGRAPH STREET CALENDAR 2000.

Telegraph Street Calendars

Anyway, he too, flew back and forth between the poles of seeing himself as The Great Genius of All-Time, or thinking he was a Worthless Piece of Zhit. In truth, his genius act was an attempt to over-compensate for this deep-seeded self-loathing that he could never shake. He never seemed to like himself. He carried himself around town like a man with a great burden on his shoulders. Who could explain that? For he certainly had more on the ball than most people. He certainly COULD have looked at himself with pride and approval. Instead he spent his days pizzing and moaning and whining in this state of perpetual disgruntlement. “You make your own breaks” is another one, and yet theres guys like Hank Deadwood who seemed to turn everything they touched into zhit.

Last year, Hank’s grandmother died and left him an inheritance of a half-a-million dollars. You know what they say (yes this is my column of old saws): “Money doesn’t really change you; it just makes you MORE of what you were before the money.” Anyways, Hank took a chunk of the money and bought himself a whole bunch of dope; rented out a room at the infamous Will Rogers Hotel in Oakland, a notorious crackhouse. I’m sure in Hank’s fantasy it would have been the even more fabled Chelsea Hotel in New York, for he was sort of trying to live out the whole bohemian Dylan/Kerouac/Burroughs fantasy that he idolized. Anyways, ole Hank got a little too high. You could imagine that last hit, as the bells started going off in his brain and the blood started rushing to his head and the airplanes started roaring off to the heavens. The custodian didn’t find him until 2 days later; he’d been lying on the floor in a coma for two days.

A friend of mine visited Hank Deadwood in the hospital later that week. He came back exclaiming; “Hank as we know him no longer exists!” They shipped what was left of him, and his half-million dollars, back to his parents in suburban New Jersey. And that was the end of The Hank Deadwood Story, at least what we would experience of it on the streets of Berkeley.

I even said in my STREET book: “A bad attitude has ruined more street people than all the other perils of the streets combined.” (And maybe that’ll be an old saw someday.) But the strangest truth of all is: Our own minds create our reality. And whatever you think will eventually manifest (so maybe we should be more careful what we think, huh?)

But the sad truth is: you see a LOT of these kind of stories on the streets. People flaming out in every way a human being can flame out. And after a while you begin to sense who the flamers are before they even flame. Because it all starts with how they look at it.

2002_10_28 Backwords on Conflict and Technology

Random Archives Banner
I realized something recently: You can have two warring parties, locked into a deadly conflict of seemingly irreconcilable differences, involving issues so complicated and convoluted they could make your head spin. But I found out that if I stood up between the two warring parties and announced: “HEY! I’m an idiot. I don’t know what the hell I’m talking about!” Finally you could have a point of view that both warring parties could readily agree upon.

I also realized that I greatly under-estimated The Power of The Computer. I mean, I only figured out how to get on the web and make a web-site 2 weeks ago. And it was only my second column, only my SECOND DAMN DAY ON THE WEB, and already I had put my foot in my mouth and gotten into the middle of a big ol’ mess. I mean, usually it takes me at least a couple of months to get into trouble. But TWO DAYS is a new record, even for me. I ended up having to spend three days mailing out about 20 apologies/retractions, as well as fielding endless urgent emails, as well as dodging zhit left and right, as well as having to stay drunk for three days on Old English Malt Liquor just to quiet the queasy jitters in my very guts.

I think a lot of it is that nobody really knows what these computers are and what they can do. I mean, I spent a good part of this decade sleeping in the bushes in a sleeping bag, so I kind of slept through most of the developments of the so-called Computer Age. Therefore, I was kind of shocked when I finally got on the web recently, only to discover there were about 50 sites that referred to me or my work. I mean, I had assumed, during my long period of self-imposed bumhood, that I had slipped into a richly-deserved, and much-needed, obscurity. Only to discover that my work, and my sordid past, was being broadcast to potential millions by a brand new medium that I didn’t begin to understand.

My first thought was: “Wow, I’m famous!” My second thought was: “Can they really publish my work on the net without my permission?” And my third thought was: “Gee, I wonder if theres any way I could make any money off this computer stuff?”

Nobody really knows what this computer stuff is all about. We’re all figuring it out on the fly. Like the Napster thing. Nobody was sure if this was a crime or not, simply because nobody had ever done it before. I think there’s going to be a lot of issues like this that get worked out over the years.

Conversely, theres a lot of people that seem to have OVER-estimated the power of the computer. There were all those dot-commer dudes who thought they could make a fortune off this so-called powerful new medium, only to all go broke.

Or take the recent legal spat involving the two cartoonists that got me thinking about all these computer issues in the first place. One of the cartoonists says it was a harmless computer prank. The other cartoonist says it was a serious computer crime. Who knows? Certainly not me, which is why I should have kept my big fat mouth shut in the first place.

But I think we’re ALL going to make some computer-related mistakes over the years. We’re all going to do some things without considering the ramifications of what we’ve done, simply because nobody has ever done this stuff before. So maybe we should take that into consideration.

Kurt Cobain and the Great Rock’n’Roll Dream

Random Archives Banner

Oct. 10, 2002.  Gene Mahoney asked me to write something about Kurt Cobain for the SFHerald (sfherald.com) so here goes:

“KURT COBAIN AND THE GREAT ROCK’N’ROLL DREAM”

It was 1994 and I remember it as if it was 8 years ago. I had spent the previous 10 years sitting behind a drawing board hacking out my comic strip, so I was itching for some action. Plus, I always had this Rock’n’roll Dream thing in the back of my mind. This John Lennon-wannabe fantasy that I wanted to play out. Plus, I still had most of my hair back then, so the sky was the limit. But I was 37 years old and time was running out.

So I hooked up with these two young kids with recording equipment and musical know-how, Alex and Gannon. They were both about 20 and they kind of embodied the “perspiration/inspiration” aspect of geniushood. Gannon was kind of the grunt side of the equation; he had long, well-shampooed hair, parted on the side and flung over his forehead — he looked just like the lead singer of the Red Hot Chili Peppers. Black guys on the street of 50th and Telegraph where he lived would stop him and say, “Ain’t you that Red Hot Chili Peppers dude?” Gannon, too, had the Rock Star Dream, and, being a practical sort, he bought an 8-track reel-to-reel tape recorder and a bunch of other equipment and set up a home-recording studio in his apartment. He took recording classes at a local college. And he laboriously laid down sort of generic Heavy Metal tracks on his equipment. It was kind of funny seeing this raucous, wild, “out-of-control” Heavy Metal rock being meticulously created, step-by-step, laying down drum machines, and then power chords, and then vocals, etc. Gannon’s trip was sort of: Rock Star as Career Move. And he was methodically laying it down, step-by-step, on his way to the top (wherever that was).

Alex was the other side of the coin, with the quicksilver inspiration that people associate with genius. He LOOKED a lot like Kurt Cobain; straw blond hair parted in the middle, rock star skinny, with apple cheeks, and torn blue jeans. The classic Cool-Kid-From-High-School look that makes up the classic image of most rock stars. Alex even shared some of Kurt Cobain’s self-loathing; nothing Alex did was ever “good enough.” He had these impossibly high standards, and he might come up with 20 good ideas, but he’d abandon most of them before they got out of the germination stage because he was embarrassed that he hadn’t produced a work of genius yet.

And then there was me: I had my John Lennon-wannabe fantasy from way back when. Problem was I looked more like a cartoonist than a rock star, plus I had no musical talent (which was the least of my drawbacks considering what they were playing on the radio) so I was hedging my bets by latching on to these two kids who had Rock Star looks as well as musical talent. What I had was media connections; having built up a modicum of so-called fame through my cartooning career. And I knew everybody, and everybody knew me, in the limited world of Punk Rock that had spawned Kurt Cobain (the Big Thing of 1994) to superstardom. I had interviewed Johnny Rotten and Jello Biafra and Henry Rollins and knew all the record labels and rock magazine publishers, had been describes as “incendiary” by no less than CREEM magazine. So I was ready to rock, dude. I knew Larry Livermore at Lookout Records — he had published my comics in Lookout Magazine, so I figured if I could get something good on tape he’d put it out on Lookout Records. Livermore had just scored big with Green Day, which sprang out of the same punk milieu as Nirvana (and me). So it wasn’t like a pipe-dream; I was at that point just one small step removed from the so-called Big Time. I remember talking on the phone with Chris Applecore — the acting head of Lookout Records — right as Green Day was preparing to appear on “Saturday Night Live” to promote their number one record. And Applecore gave me good advice on where to get my CD pressed and where to get the cover art printed (the legendary Punx With Presses, which is a whole nother story).

Plus, the Grateful Dead were hitting the peak of their popularity, inexplicably, in 1994 (and what a long, strange trip it had been) with their brand of psychedelic street music, which I liked; as well as the peaking popularity of the Power Pop Punk of Nirvana and Green Day, which I also liked. So it seemed to be all coming together for me at that moment. If I could get something good on tape, all the other pieces were in place to really take off.

I had been publishing the TELEGRAPH STREET CALENDAR at the time, selling about 2,000 copies a year and getting featured on the Dan Rather CBS News and the front page  of the local papers. So I hit on the idea of recording a compilation CD of local street musicians, using the same format as the STREET CALENDAR, publishing a photo magazine of the  street freak musicians along with a CD of their music — you could see them and read about them, and also HEAR them. I felt my own music on its own wasn’t strong enough to go over, so I was hedging my bets. Little did I know how many other people shared the Rock’n’roll Dream; and every wannabe was now auditioning for me and harassing me and seeing me as the Last Desperate Hopes for their cherished dream. Crackheads from East Oakland that wanted to live out their Sly Stone dream. Suburban junkies that wanted to live out their Keith Richards dream. And me, gobbling down LSD by the handful as part of the Rock Star Accessory Kit that would turn me into a John Lennon type genius of my dreams.

Which brings us back to Alex, the cute blond boy, Kurt Cobain-wannabe with his rock’n’roll dream, who was the recording whiz behind the controls of this whole mad enterprise. These Rock Stars they really were Role Models for so many of us. I mean, we aspired to Be Them, or something. There was something fundamental about the whole deal; something very basic, where so many of our most basic premises of what we Wanted to Be, what we Wanted to Do with Our Lives, what we considered a Successful Life, what we were Striving Towards, seemed to stem from these Rock Stars. Or at least who we thought they were.

Anyway, it was April and I had managed to scrounge up a $5,000 grant to fund this whole mad enterprise. So I set up a big recording session in this boarded-up old bank on Shattuck Avenue. I gathered together all the recording equipment, and Alex and Gannon — the two recording geniuses — and all the streetfreak musicians who wanted their Moment in the Spotlight, and me, with my beat-up old guitar and supply of LSD, together in this building to record our great and future masterpiece of a CD. Christ, at that point I had never even BOUGHT a CD, let alone a CD player, and now I’m going to RECORD a CD. But I was Captain Trips Revisited, and if you take enough drugs, ANYTHING can make a certain sense. And don’t forget: I was a mere one step removed from Superstardom. I remember when those punk fukks in Green Day were just high school kids happy to get a gig at Gilman and play before 30 people at Gilman. And now there they were appearing on “Saturday Night Live” in front of the Whole World. So anything was possible.

Anyway, the night before the first big recording session, April 1994, I’m listening to the radio and I hear the news that Kurt Cobain — our role model, our guiding light, the Successful Rock Star, the man we aspired to be — had blown his fukking brains out.

The next day, I walk into the recording session that I had spent months setting up. Our big dream. There was cute blond boy Alex, with his torn blue jeans, who looks just like Kurt Cobain. 20 years old. Kurt Cobain is our Barometer of Success. He’s who we’re aspiring to be. Now, he, Kurt Cobain, is lying on a slab in a mortuary with half his brains blown out. I look at Alex, cute blond boy Kurt Cobain-wannabe, and he looks at me, 37-year-old acid head, John Lennon-wannabe, and it was a moment, as they say, that gave me pause. Cobain Himself had described his work, bitterly, as “nothing but recycled Lennon.” And now we were in the process of recycling Cobain recycling Lennon.

Anyway, I guess we all have a tendency to chase after false gods. And we all have those moments when we realize we were duped, that we’d been suckered, swindled, by some con-man, or maybe just betrayed by our own greed, weakness, vanity, ego, and/or foolishness. But lets just say The Great Rock’n’roll Dream didn’t look particularly great at that moment.